On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 11:16:29PM -0400, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 20:44, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> > Possibly not a very critical bug (I do not know that really)
> > but a bug nevertheless. It does not look that regs.len is
> > used very extensively. Presumably it is set in a preceding
> > copy_from_user() call and not used really in any other place.
>
> Ethtool is expecting bytes there, so it looks to me that the
revised
> patch is necessary for "ethtool -d" to return correct data...
This was the reason I changed it in the Fedora kernel.
The version of the patch you have was in the fedora kernel for
a while too, I silently fixed it up in the next revision
(as it only hit -testing). Looks like you picked it up before
I fixed it up. Good job someone was paying attention 8)
In future, I'll try and give you a heads up if I change something
like that again without making extra changelog entries.
Dave
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list redhat com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list