[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
packages needing QA and how to QA
- From: seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu>
- To: fedora-legacy-list redhat com
- Subject: packages needing QA and how to QA
- Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 02:55:08 -0400
Hi all,
Some packages need some more people to check them out.
This is more or less how you do that:
http://www.fedoralegacy.org/wiki/index.php/QaTesting
the packages that need some checking:
libxml2 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1324
gdk-pixbuf - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1371
cadaver - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1552
mc - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1548
mozilla and friends - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1532
kdelibs - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1373
lha - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1547
rsync - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1569
packages that have two PUBLISH and are more or less there but wouldn't
hurt from having more people try them:
sysstat - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1372
libpng - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1550
utempter - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1546
xchat - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1549
So download the packages, check the checksums, look over the patches,
build/install them and tell us if things look right. the more input the
less broken things will be. :)
Thanks,
-sv
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]