fedora-legacy-list Digest, Vol 3, Issue 24

[Jesse Keating]

On Thursday 20 May 2004 15:53, Howard Owen wrote:
> Businesses I have knowledge of have shied away from Fedora Core
> because of the rapid rate of change issue. In my opinion, folks who
> have taken the plunge with FC1 on production machines really need to
> seriously consider upgrading to FC2. This is in line with the
> objectives quoted above. Red Hat and the volunteers at the Fedora
> project seem to have tried awfully hard to make that as smooth as
> possible. (c.f. *not turning on SELinux by default.)

Sure there is a rapid change rate.  Fedora Legacy was originally 
concieved to provide a longer life span for Fedora Core releases.  The 
support for RHL 7.3/9 is just a byproduct of this, an added bonus.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
 
Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20040520/84282a3b/attachment.sig>