[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: FC1 OpenOffice.org builds
- From: Colin Charles <byte aeon com my>
- To: Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project <fedora-legacy-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: FC1 OpenOffice.org builds
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:55:02 +0800
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 11:11 -0500, Rob Myers wrote:
> > Usually we only release security updates, but we can discuss making an
> > exception for OOo.
>
> my thoughts are that if 1) it comes from an upstream maintainer, 2) it
> passes QA, and 3) it fixes an existing package without changing it "too
> much" it should be published.
In fact, for (1) you can drop the "upstream" bit, and make sure that (2)
and (3) happen, and a package should still be pushed
All this assuming the maintainer in (1) is willing to continue
maintaining the package, and let bugs get assigned to her/him
--
Colin Charles, byte aeon com my
http://www.bytebot.net/
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]