[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Round-up, 2004-11-28
- From: Jim Popovitch <jimpop yahoo com>
- To: Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project <fedora-legacy-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Round-up, 2004-11-28
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:36:24 -0800 (PST)
--- Jesse eating <jkeating j2solutions net> wrote:
> Other than the account, what is too complex?
IMO, The bug system itself. That, and the steps involved in completely
understanding WHAT needs to be tested and having/maintaining a stable (but not
production) system to test the fix on. Oh yeah, also having enough faith to
trust that others have *really* and *solidly* tested what they are labeling
resolved.
I think FL has just grown too fast and is trying to do too much. Support
barely begins before it is dropped. I'd wish that RH would deal with their
FC1/2/3 mess, they created it, and let FL focus only on Redhat Legacy stuff
(i.e 6.2,7.3,8,9). Perhaps it's worth splitting and starting a Redhat-Legacy
group, that way FL could focus on Fedora features and the new group could focus
on just older Redhat security patches. Then again, Dag pretty much has that
covered.
-Jim P.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]