On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 15:56, Brent J. Nordquist wrote: > The bug description says libxml2 prior to 2.6.6 is affected. RHL 9 has > libxml2 2.5.4, but the bug only fixes RHL 7.x/8 -- is RHL 9 affected or > unaffected, anyone know? RHL 9 is affected, but Red Hat already came out with an advisory for this issue before RHL9's end-of-life. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-091.html Marc.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part