[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: RPM/YUM/Mach catch-22



Jesse Keating wrote:

When no epoch is present, 0 is assumed.  Adding epoch 0 shouldn't break
anything.  Please try this and test within a chroot?

Not with rh73's version of rpm. Epoch-less packages are the equivalent of Epoch -1 (ie, Epoch: 0 trumps a lack of Epoch).

-- Rex


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]