[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: changes are still needed
- From: Jim Popovitch <jimpop yahoo com>
- To: Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project <fedora-legacy-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: changes are still needed
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:27:17 -0400
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 21:16 +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
> It's a bit complex, and if the "server guys" are interested in higher
> QA, I'm sure they will participate more actively in QA'ing the server
> packages :)
I *DO* Q&A the RH73 server packages, the problem is they are still held
up by the lack of interest in FC1, RH9, etc.
I *DO NOT* do Q&A on packages I have no interest (and/or knowledge) in,
nor do I expect anyone else to. We are not doing Q&A for CUA reasons.
We are doing Q&A for security and stability reasons. Therefore I think
it is foolish to keep asking people unfamiliar with an application (not
to mention the bug/flaw/fix) to do Q&A on said application.
-Jim P.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]