Re: how to get started with helping the project [...]

[David Curry <dsccable comcast net>]

Jim Popovitch wrote:

> On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 10:16 -0500, Marcus Lauer wrote:
>  
>
> >        I think that's why Mr. Rostetter suggested that you make a
> > list.  The "discussion" was such a mess that maybe a nice clear list of
> > what you'd like to see done would help.
> >    
>
> OK, good point.  I have been overly critical, and a lot of that is
> directed towards what appears to me to be apathy, so shame on me for not
> being more detailed.  I will take the task of trying to define a
> structure and associated responsibilities list.  This may take a few
> days, but the weekend is coming up.  Everyone please feel free to pass
> on your opinions on what you think is needed or what isn't needed and I
> will try to release a plan over the weekend.
>
> -Jim P.
>
> --
> fedora-legacy-list mailing list
> fedora-legacy-list redhat com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
>
>  
This from a newbie and another lurker who has not made a single 
contribution to FL.

I suggest that you think in terms of working up a sturcture and 
associated responsibilities list PROPOSAL rahter than  a definition.

Speaking bluntly, reading all of the exchanges on the subject thread 
leaves me with one overriding impression - that you want to be King.

Getting started helping with the project is not the easiest thing in the 
world to do.  (But, it is far from the hardest either.)

I find no basis in fact for your assertions that FL misleads people.  
Had I been on the receiving end of many of your remarks, I would have 
invited you to stuff your opinions where the sun don't shine.