[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Numbering conventions
- From: "Brian T. Brunner" <brian t brunner gai-tronics com>
- To: <fedora-legacy-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Numbering conventions
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:41:17 -0800
Yes, the version numbering reads from left-to-right
2.4.20.99 is before 2.4.21.1
'legacy' indicates it is from the fedora-legacy project; progeny is unknown
to me except an ISP brand name.
athlon. vs i386 vs <none> indicates whether the rpm is built on/for a particular
architecture. .i386 runs anywhere (tm) but .athlon is not guaranteed on i686 or
x64 architecture.
Brian Brunner
brian t brunner gai-tronics com
(610)796-5838
>>> fedoraleg_form mm-vanecek cc 03/28/05 01:51PM >>>
I am getting a little confused about the numbering conventions.
For example, how does (if it does)
kernel-2.4.20-31.9.progeny.7.athlon.rpm
compare with
kernel-2.4.20-42.9.legacy.athlon.rpm?
Can I assume that the legacy version is a more current version than the progeny?
Thanks.
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list redhat com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
*******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.
www.hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]