[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: dependency hell, version 2,197,386.1
- From: Gene Heskett <gene heskett verizon net>
- To: Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project <fedora-legacy-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: dependency hell, version 2,197,386.1
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:54:40 -0400
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 01:56, Stuart Low wrote:
>Hey,
>
>> How can I go about convincing yum to update the iptables install on my
>> old firewall box when it reports this:
>> [root gene etc]# yum update iptables
>> package iptables needs kernel that has been excluded
>> package iptables needs kernel that has been excluded
>> The kernel is in fact a 2.4.29, obviously new enough but locally
>> built. Is this a case where the --nodeps --force options to rpm can be
>> used?
>
>Probably not the smartest move. Be best to manually download the latest
>kernel rpm and rpm -ivh it. Then modify your lilo/grub config back to
>booting your custom kernel by default.
>
>That way you've avoided the dep issue but haven't lost your custom
>kernel.
Humm, thats an AMD k6-III in that box, so I grabbed the 586 kernel, is
this correct?
>Stuart
>
>--
>fedora-legacy-list mailing list
>fedora-legacy-list redhat com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.35% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]