[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Old yum? New yum? Re: Typo in yum instructions
- From: David Eisenstein <deisenst gtw net>
- To: Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project <fedora-legacy-list redhat com>
- Subject: Old yum? New yum? Re: Typo in yum instructions
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 16:26:33 -0600 (CST)
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 12:55 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> > I upgraded one server to get the new improved XML metadata, only to find
> > that Legacy didn't have the new metadata. So I didn't apply the update to
> > my other servers. (I use one server as a guinea pig before letting the
> > others update themselves.)
> >
>
> Legacy has this metadata now, and other mirrors will have it when they
> sync. (as of a week ago?)
Can someone explain about "old yum" and "new yum?" I am confused about
this, and am not finding anything in Fedora Legacy's documentation that
helps me better understand it.
I run Fedora Core 1, and have its yum (yum-2.0.4-2 from the original FC1
distro) installed. Is this the "new" yum? Or is the yum in updates for
FC1 (yum-2.0.5-1) the new yum? If not, how do I go about getting the new
yum? Will both the old and new yums work with fedoralegacy download
sites, and/or other repositories?
Also, the URL reported in the yum package on my system is
<http://www.dulug.duke.edu/yum/>. When I go to that wep-page, it looks
like a Duke University Linux Users' Group moinmoin wiki page:
"yum
"This page does not exist yet. You can create a new empty page,
or use one of the page templates. Before creating the page,
please check if a similar page already exists."
Where do I find out more information about the flavors of yum? And how
yummy are they? :)
Thanks. -David
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]