[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]
- From: Pekka Savola <pekkas netcore fi>
- To: Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project <fedora-legacy-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:55:50 +0200 (EET)
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Jeff Sheltren wrote:
What I'd like to see is to have something like this (Pekka's idea above)
happen for regular package contributors (people that have submitted multiple
packages to FL). People that haven't submitted many packages should require
one of the trusted packagers/builders to do a "publish" QA before pushing the
package to testing. Since the current state of things is that it's only a
small group of people doing things, this won't really affect anyone at the
moment- but it's just a way to ease new packagers in while being sure that
they are submitting "good" packages.
Yes, "automatic publish without VERIFY QA" depends a lot that the
package proposals, PUBLISH QA (for every distro), and building and
pushing to updates-testing (by FL core people) is done properly.
Given that this currently (unfortunately) happens almost solely by a
very small set of people (say, about 5), as you say, this isn't a
problem now. Even if new people came up to join the PUBLISH crowd,
I'm confident that they'd blend in because there's pretty good
guidance in Wiki on how to do good package proposals, publish, etc.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]