[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]
- From: James Kosin <jkosin beta intcomgrp com>
- To: Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project <fedora-legacy-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:30:03 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> It is referred from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legacy which has a
> link from the frontpage. How is that buried in clutter?. What can we do
> to improve that?\
>
Don't get personal, I'm talking semantics here about not outlining them
as steps.
ex: The first one is named 'QASubmit'... OK maybe a limitation of wiki
here and not someone's exact wording... but, maybe a description saying
Package Resubmitting Procedures could be better. Something pointing to
the fact the page is a procedural form instead of a simple description.
Even something like follow these steps or procedures....
James Kosin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFD8i+7kNLDmnu1kSkRAu6zAJ4874rS9Xfly2zdxapfWJecy7ObuQCffu8j
7Kz9ON76BJye21LktA4fJtk=
=qJij
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Scanned by ClamAV - http://www.clamav.net
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]