Re: no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Eric Rostetter <rostetter mail utexas edu>]

Quoting Jesse Keating <jkeating j2solutions net>:

> Our hope is that if this proposal scares some people, it will scare them
> into finding ways to help out the project so that little to no packages
> escape updates-testing w/out some QA done on it.

My fear is that we spend more time arguing about these than we do testing.
As I've said the last 3-4 times this came up; if each of us spent as much
time QA testing packages as we do arguing about the QA processing on the
mailing list, we wouldn't have any problem at all.

I know these threads stop me from doing any QA while they are going on.

> --
> Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
> Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
> GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)



--
Eric Rostetter
The Department of Physics
The University of Texas at Austin

Go Longhorns!