[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Fwd: Re: New Mozilla vulnerabilities??]
- From: David Eisenstein <deisenst gtw net>
- To: Josh Bressers <bressers redhat com>
- Cc: fedora-legacy-list redhat com, fedora-security-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: New Mozilla vulnerabilities??]
- Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:28:01 -0500
Josh Bressers wrote:
>>Matthew Miller wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 02:36:13PM -0500, David Eisenstein wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>It mentions a bunch of vulnerabilities (all of which seem to affect
>>>>Seamonkey, Thunderbird, and Firefox). After looking at each VU#, it appears
>>>>that none of the announcements mention the Mozilla suite. Also, at least as
>>>>of last night, none of them mention any CVE #'s.
>>>
>>>
>>>No updates for Firefox for Fedora Core yet, either....
>>>
>>><https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194617>
>>>
>>I heard a rumor the other day that Red Hat Enterprise Linux may be planning
>>to replace Mozilla with Seamonkey in their currently-maintained distros. Am
>>wondering if there is any truth to this rumor? Also wondering if there is
>>anything we in Fedora Legacy can do to help in this process of dealing with
>>these critical Mozilla/Firefox/Seamonkey bugs?
>
>
> This is true. We're going with seamonkey in RHEL. I think this current
> round of issues is proof as to why this has to happen. Backporting to the
> firefox 1.0 branch is nearly impossible given the drastic changes between
> versions.
>
> Right now we're furiously working on backporting patches for the most
> critical issues. If you want to help mail Chris Aillon (caillon redhat)
> with your request. He's currently heading up a small group of various
> distributors trying to get all this work done.
>
You are backporting patches then for the most critical issues for Mozilla
suite 1.7.13 only, Josh? Or also for Firefox-1.0.8?
Regards,
David
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]