Documentation question at fedoralegacy.org

[James Kosin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Matt Temple wrote:
> 
> But looking at the download site, it /looks/ as though the x86_64 rpms
> are there.
> (Not so for core 2). 
> Does the site need this updated?
> 
Matt,

Good point; but, they may be holding off updating this fact until we see
the workload involved with this.  Since x86_64 stuff adds a layer of
complexity to the issue.

- -James
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFECJpskNLDmnu1kSkRAlY5AJ9tS3sbBCDER/fruOiCXuptgEdnmwCcCn2Z
T2oqX0v8n9zvrrQ5SiCeXeA=
=X3cN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
Scanned by ClamAV - http://www.clamav.net