[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Documentation question at fedoralegacy.org
- From: James Kosin <jkosin beta intcomgrp com>
- To: Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project <fedora-legacy-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Documentation question at fedoralegacy.org
- Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 14:35:08 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Matt Temple wrote:
>
> But looking at the download site, it /looks/ as though the x86_64 rpms
> are there.
> (Not so for core 2).
> Does the site need this updated?
>
Matt,
Good point; but, they may be holding off updating this fact until we see
the workload involved with this. Since x86_64 stuff adds a layer of
complexity to the issue.
- -James
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFECJpskNLDmnu1kSkRAlY5AJ9tS3sbBCDER/fruOiCXuptgEdnmwCcCn2Z
T2oqX0v8n9zvrrQ5SiCeXeA=
=X3cN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Scanned by ClamAV - http://www.clamav.net
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]