Documentation question at fedoralegacy.org

[Jesse Keating]

On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 12:48 -0500, Matt Temple wrote:
> But looking at the download site, it /looks/ as though the x86_64
> rpms 
> are there.
> (Not so for core 2).  
> 
> Does the site need this updated? 

We're testing a new build system and the by product of that testing is
some x86_64 packages.  We haven't yet started rebuilding all the old
updates to spit out x86_64 packages, just new updates are getting them.
We haven't made any official announcements or updated the pages, we're
still evaluating the build system and the packages it generates.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20060303/d42e5ac5/attachment.sig>