Rebuild exisitng errata for x86_64?

[Jesse Keating]

On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> The way I see it, Fedora Extras and Core already have access to PPC 
> systems and Legacy is meanwhile waiting for hardware donations. If we 
> share the infrastructure and we are well integrated, that shouldnt be 
> happening. This is not about shoving anything but tapping into the 
> resources available till we can separate it more in the future if thats 
> desirable.
> 

This 'donation' could come from Red Hat, much like the Extras systems
came from Red Hat.  The thing is we want separation now, so rather than
get settled into a system and then move out later, we'd rather do it
right to begin with.  Some of the resources can be shared, such as a
repo of all the Fedora packages to pull from on a high speed link.  So
think of it as adding a couple more systems into the existing
infrastructure and just tagging them for use by Legacy.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20060303/2c150f07/attachment.sig>