[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Bugzilla status whiteboard explanation needed
- From: "Pavel Kankovsky" <peak argo troja mff cuni cz>
- To: Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project <fedora-legacy-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Bugzilla status whiteboard explanation needed
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 22:23:32 +0100 (CET)
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Pekka Savola wrote:
> > - rh73 and rh9 is used instead of rhl73 and rhl9
> This may have been typo in the wiki, and these should be rh73 and
> rh90 (or rh9), at least that's what all current packages use.
171 bugs with rh90
12 bugs with rh9
8 bugs with rhl
"rh73" and "rh90" are our winners
Can anyone privileged enough fix it in the wiki?
(Or grant me the privs to do it? <g>)
> > - impact=xxx is not documented at all
> It has no impact on FL ;-/
There is a handful of FL entries using it, e.g.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181014
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184074
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184098
<shrug>
--Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ]
"Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for assimilation."
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]