New sendmail and missing /usr/lib/sendmail

[Jesse Keating]

On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 13:43 -0500, James Kosin wrote:
> Sounds like something didn't get built correctly.  Was this a new 
> release of sendmail or a patch?
> I believe my packages needed (or at least I let them build a -cf 
> package) at one point.  My version has been working for some time with 
> no problems with man or other changes.
> 
> Did the SPEC file change significantly? 

The patches supplied by Sendmail did not apply to older releases, so all
releases had to be updated to 8.12.11.  RHEL set a precedent on this
when they updated the version on RHEL2.1.  The spec did change in many
ways, and unfortunately I didn't catch the significance of the changes
w/regard to alternatives.

These issues should be resolved in the newer packages in
updates-testing.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20060327/21448041/attachment.sig>