Re: Fedora products, to upgrade rather than backport?

[James Kosin <jkosin beta intcomgrp com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
Jesse Keating wrote:
> And follow upstream example if possible.  If "upstream" Fedora
> upgrades to fix an issue, we probably should to for the Fedora's
> we're supporting (shouldn't be more than 2 after this next
> transition), but if they decide to backport, we should as well.
>
I agree with Jesse here; but, I would like to add that the packages
should be tested on the released platform by someone and not just
released in this case.
SendMail was a recent blunder of sorts because of this.

- -James

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQFEaPJ0kNLDmnu1kSkRAolBAJ9tRSig3f1afywXIQIRENfqQCP5UACfdcne
B1C0jnFOpzretFUs+PS5FtY=
=ORAr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Scanned by ClamAV - http://www.clamav.net