Re: Fedora products, to upgrade rather than backport?

["Nils Breunese (Lemonbit Internet)" <nils lemonbit nl>]

Jesse Keating wrote:

> On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 16:12 -0500, Eric Rostetter wrote:
> > You can though think it does make sense to change the handling  
> > because
> > it is EOL, independent of who is touching it.  EOL means end of  
> > development
> > which means end of upgrades, at least to some.
>
> Can we agree to not use the term EOL in this way?  I made a huge  
> mistake
> in starting this trend.  We really should be looking at 'EOL' as when
> _we_ stop touching it.

Maybe the front page of fedoralegacy.org should be changed as well  
then. It currently reads: "(...) The goal of The Fedora Legacy  
Project is to work with the Linux community to provide security and  
critical bug fix errata packages for select End of Life Red Hat Linux  
and Fedora Core distributions. (...)"

Nils Breunese.