[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
- From: Eric Rostetter <rostetter mail utexas edu>
- To: fedora-legacy-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:06:57 -0600
Quoting Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com>:
See my blog regarding the future of Legacy as a project. Please remember
these are just proposals and not final solutions. A wiki page will follow
soon.
First I would like to say to those who say Fedora Legacy has failed, that
it _did_ work (i.e. didn't fail) for the most critical time period and the
most critical OS version (RHL 7-9, FC1). If it has failed, or is failing,
it must not be forgotten that before it failed it worked exceedingly well.
Second, I'm fairly comfortable with saying that if FC goes to a 13 month
support cycle, FL is basically not needed anymore. IMHO, people can upgrade
once a year when presented with a known/documented release cycle, and known
documented alternatives.
Now, I don't know that FC will change, or if FL is needed any more even
if FC doesn't change. But I do know that FL saved my life by being there
when I needed it, and while I don't really need it any more I'm forever
grateful to it for being there when I did need it.
--
Eric Rostetter
The Department of Physics
The University of Texas at Austin
Go Longhorns!
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]