Fedora breaks dhcpd, RH9 doesn't?

[andrew.crofts at nokia.com]

Thanks, Mike, however....
Haven't tried that yet, because the firewall script (which I haven't posted, because of sheer size, but it's basically here:
http://www.linux.org/docs/ldp/howto/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO/stronger-firewall-examples.html
) is also identical when using RH9 and Fedora 1. I'm pretty strict with the First Written Law Of Engineering (i.e., if it wasn't written down, it didn't happen!)and every step's documented.
I will try when I get home - and can pull the Internet socket out!

But I've a feeling it's a compatibility someplace.

Daft Q. but i'm assuming dhcpd's built into FC1's kernel?? Not-too-brave assumption, but...

-Andy


> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-list-admin at redhat.com
> [mailto:fedora-list-admin at redhat.com]On Behalf Of ext Michael Kearey
> Sent: 10 December, 2003 13:46
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: Fedora breaks dhcpd, RH9 doesn't?
> 
> 
> andrew.crofts at nokia.com wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > Synopsis - install RH9, dhcpd works, gives out addresses.
> > Install or upgrade to Fedora Core 1, dhcp no longer gives 
> addresses. Repeatable (two RH 9 installs, 2 Fedora installs, 
> one RH9-FC1 update from CD's)
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> Very quickly, and I know probably the first thing you tried - 
> firewall 
> setting?
> 
> Try turning firewall off  'service iptables stop'  then test.
> I have a FC 1 box doing dhcpd service and it is quite ok..
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>