New to Fedora (RHL Veteran), kinda confused.

[Gareth Bult]

Hi,

I'd go along with the RH10 comment.

Ran it for about a week in 32 bit mode, no problems or crashes.

Some nice tweaks on the GUI for example the graphical boot up, and I
notice that
the video setup now supports my nVidia twin-head and dual screen
configurations.
(RH9 didn't!)

Also, yes, my wishlist of additional software now seems to be included
... :)

HTH
Gareth.

On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 02:06, Mike Thrift wrote:

> So, I'm a little confused, but trying to get everything understood.  How 
> stable is FC1?  I read the interview on linuxquestions.org and I thought 
> Jeremy said it is as stable as RH10 would be, is this the case?  Also, 
> what are the base packages based on, did they just take Shrike and throw 
> it to the fedora project, or is this just a completely different distro 
> utilizing latest versions of software?  I haven't had a ton of time to 
> look around, and I appreciate any info anybody can provide.  TIA!!
> 
> Mike.
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

-- 
Gareth Bult <Gareth at Bult.co.uk>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20031211/1e29f94a/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smiley-3.png
Type: image/png
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20031211/1e29f94a/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20031211/1e29f94a/attachment-0001.sig>