On Sat, 2003-12-27 at 10:30, Jeff Lasman wrote:
> On Saturday 27 December 2003 01:24 am, Lorenzo Prince wrote:
>
> > Hi. I am testing to see if my pgp signing is more readable now.
>
> I'm reading the list with KMail 1.5, KDE 3.1-10, RHL9. Your previous
> emails, before you changed, were marked:
Thanks. I have been toying with replacing Evolution with something that
is more resource efficient. Kmail is much more efficient but still lacks
some features. Sylpheed seems unstable. Mozilla Mail makes PGP signing
an esoteric endeavor comparable to Vedic study.
---------
Quality Management - A Commitment to Excellence
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part