[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
is there something totally screwed with "patch"?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday mindspring com>
- To: Fedora List <fedora-list redhat com>
- Subject: is there something totally screwed with "patch"?
- Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 09:37:55 -0500 (EST)
i couldn't find anything on bugzilla about this, so here goes.
after an hour of trying to figure out why a large compile of mine
wasn't working, i've narrowed it down to the "patch" command.
quite simply, "patch" doesn't.
i've applied a short patch file against a directory of glibc
source, the command assures me that it's applying the patch, it
correctly tells me where the hunks were applied, and so on. and
after it's all over ... no change to the file.
as a test, i replaced my standard
$ patch ... < patchfile
with
$ patch ... --input=patchfile
which should be equivalent, and *now* it tells me that the
patch file is not found! exactly the same file that allegedly
worked when i used stdin.
can anyone enlighten me?
rday
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]