[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Fedora and the System Administrator
- From: Chuck Wolber <chuckw quantumlinux com>
- To: fedora-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Fedora and the System Administrator
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 17:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
> > I dont expect that this will be any different for any of the Linux
> > companies and volunteer orgs (Debian) in the coming years. Everytime
> > there is a new Debian, the security volunteers say they will only
> > maintain the old release for 6 months and there is great wailing and
> > nashing of teeth about how shitty Debian is.
>
> The difference of course is, Debian offers a stable release life of over
> 2 years prior. That is hardly as aggravating as making a major migration
> potentially twice a year. I think you will find very few orgs willing to
> deploy Fedora under those conditions, and even fewer able to justify
> paying for RHEL being that it is quite expensive compared to other
> options.
That's our point. When you deploy on hundreds of servers, like many of the
consortium members do, there's no chance in heck that we're going to pay a
minimum of $179 (on up to $2500 IIRC) *PER* server. I'd much prefer to
pool resources and distribute the cost.
-Chuck
--
Quantum Linux Laboratories - ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology
* Education | -=^ Ad Astra Per Aspera ^=-
* Integration | http://www.quantumlinux.com
* Support | chuckw quantumlinux com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]