Fedora and the System Administrator -- "have" -> "had"

[Paul Gear]

Buck wrote:
> May I ask, what alternative are you looking at?
> ...
> -----Original Message-----
> That's a self-contradictory statement.  If a product is not protected
> from vulnerabilities, it is not stable enough to operate for long
> periods.  And that's what makes Fedora unsuitable for university,
> non-profit, and small business server environments.

It's a good thing i'm not Michael S.  :-)

I'm not looking at any particular alternatives yet - RHL9 is still
supported, and my machines are staying on it for the time being.  I'm
waiting for RH to come up with a reasonable alternative for us non-profits.

Attn: Tom Callaway, i still haven't heard anything from anyone at Red
Hat on this note...
-- 
Paul
http://paulgear.webhop.net

A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20031004/243608e4/attachment-0001.sig>