[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: OK so where's Beta #2
- From: Marc Schwartz <MSchwartz MedAnalytics com>
- To: fedora-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: OK so where's Beta #2
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:43:43 -0500
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 11:23, Rick Johnson wrote:
> Terry Polzin wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 25 September 2003 10:04, Chris Ricker wrote:
> >
> >>Mirrors have been told that severn beta #2 should be made publically
> >>available at 2:00 PM EDT today (Sep 25)
> >
> >
> > Same path?
>
> Apparently, access is denied to it presently.
>
> -Rick
Related to this subject, in an obtuse sort of way, what is the
recommended/preferred approach to upgrading from RH 9 to Fedora Beta #2?
Can one do a distro upgrade or should one do a fresh install? If the
latter, will the Fedora install process preserve the present /home tree
structure if one does not alter the partitions?
FWIW, I am presently using yum and apt/synaptic DL'd from the fedora.us
site for RH 9 stable.
TIA,
Marc
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]