[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: useNoSSLForPackages and other badly-conceived options (noticenon-hijacked thread!)
- From: Pekka Savola <pekkas netcore fi>
- To: fedora-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: useNoSSLForPackages and other badly-conceived options (noticenon-hijacked thread!)
- Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 16:36:08 +0300 (EEST)
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Barry K. Nathan wrote:
[...]
> Besides, SSL provides real security. For instance, the fact that SSL is
> enabled by default was a good defense against this hole:
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-255.html
Note that SSL is just a tool. It depends heavily either on Certificate
Authorities to do their job properly, or "opportunistic" self-signed
certificate exchange working. It gives close to zero protection if you
connect to a HTTPS site X for the first time, and you don't have any
reference to the certificate the site X is using.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]