[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: will future cd's be apt
- From: "duncan brown" <duncanbrown email com>
- To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: will future cd's be apt
- Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 14:10:39 -0500
the fedora team (the one external to redhat, but still a vital part of fc1/fc2) maintain an apt and yum repository, along with MANY packages that do not come with the standard fc install.
http://www.fedora.us
and, as far as desktop use is concerned, i think synaptic is better than apt and yum, also =]
-d
----- Original Message -----
From: n_powell <nathan lagerbottom com>
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 21:45:39 -0400
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
Subject: Re: will future cd's be apt
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 02:35:04 +0100
> thus spake Martin Alderson <mail martinalderson co uk>:
>
> > > Is the Fedora Core 2 cd's going to be apt enabled
> > > will redhat enable apt to be used with their up2date servers
> >
> > For what it's worth, I agree completly.
> > Thats my 2 cents anyway..
>
> I would like to third that. Apt is a full head and shoulders above yum.
> IMNSHO. I am not sure why it is not part of FC now. - Just incase the
> devel team reads any of this :)
>
>
>
> ===============================
> use perl;
>
> nathan
> nathan_at_lagerbottom_dot_com
> www.lagerbottom.com
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list redhat com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Time will end all my troubles, but I don't always approve of Time's methods.
+( duncan brown
+( duncanbrown email com
+( http://www.linuxadvocate.net
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]