I've put together some details about how I switched from being a heavy
Dreamweaver (version 3.x) user to developing Web sites with
Free/Open-source software. No, my current system isn't a
feature-for-feature replacement of Dreamweaver's functionality, but I
like it, and it works for me!
I've posted it in HTML format on my Web site:
http://www.lightlink.com/mc2/dw_switch.pl
Here's the plain ol' text:
The story of how a once heavy user of Macromedia's Dreamweaver
switched to Web development in Linux...
First, some notes:
* I liked using Dreamweaver v3.0. It's a darned good program. I
hear that later version are even better.
* I wanted to use Free/Open-source Software (FOSS)
* Despite it's goodness, I was frustrated with the limitations of
templates and libraries in DW v3.0
* I administer my own Linux/Apache/MySQL/PHP Web servers
* I'm pretty darn good at throwing together a PHP script in a
pinch. (read: I've been coding PHP Web apps full-time for many years now)
* This is not a guide for how to run Dreamweaver in Linux.
* This article will not suggest a replacement WYSIWYG HTML editor
for Linux that will let you do all the things that DW does, because
there currently aren't any.
* Your mileage may vary (YMMV). etc., etc.
My Problem(s):
1.
I had developed a rather large Web site (no, not this site, this
one's tiny) consisting of about 600 - 800 static pages, and a fair
number of Web applications using:
* Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP (a.k.a. a "LAMP") server
* Windows 98
* Dreamweaver 3.0 with lots of templates and libraries
* TextPad v4.x (a terrific text editor for Windows)
2. DW v3.0 templates and libraries were limiting what I wanted to do
with the site. Updating a template or a library required that I
check-out and update hundreds of files. That just sucks.
3. I realized that I was getting more and more dependent on the
functionality of Dreamweaver. I didn't like this idea. I wanted my
content to be completely separate from the program used to create it.
4. I was tired of Windows, and wanted to switch to Free/Open-source
software.
How I switched:
1. Began using PHP includes to replace DW templates and libraries.
The idea being that I never wanted to have any bit of HTML duplicated
in more than one file. This was the beginning of the end for
Dreamweaver in my case! I now have so much more control and almost no
duplication of code. The PHP includes can be designed to be much more
powerful/smarter than DW's client side content tools. This of course
requires that you have a server that runs PHP...
2. I had to gut all of the content files of their DW markup and
replace it with the PHP includes. This took a while, but a text editor
that can find and replace text using regular expressions over multiple
files (TextPad v.4.x in Windows) helped tremendously.
3. Once free of Dreamweaver's grasp, I had to find a way to keep
working!
My FOSS tool kit:
* Linux: Fedora Core 1
* KDE: version 3.2.x
o Kate: a good general purpose GUI text editor
o Konqueror: In split vertical window mode for transferring
files via FTP between my workstation and the Web server.
o Quanta: An HTML editor for KDE
My Procedure(s):
Coding/Creating Content:
Kate:
I primarily do all of my work in Kate (or occasionally Vim, or Nedit
if I have regular expression find/replace to do). I set up Kate to
show line numbers, set my tab spacing to "4", and show the list of
open files on the left side of the screen. I have a text file that I
call "clip_library" (a hold over from using TextPad for Windows) in
which I store commonly used bits of code for quick copy, paste, and
modify jobs. I usually have Kate running all day on Desktop 2. Since
I'm using PHP includes to include the various bells and whistles, my
content is very straight-forward, and I use only HTML H1 - H4 tags, P
(paragraph) tags, UL/OL (lists) and the occasional TABLE. I use CSS to
style my content as needed.
The basic layout of my Web pages looks like this:
<?
require_once("the header php script");
?>
PAGE CONTENT
<?
require_once("the footer php script");
?>
There are probably more elegant ways of doing this, but it ain't
causing me many problems currently, so I haven't bothered to change
it. The header and footer scripts (which include other php files as
needed) set up all of the structure and features that surround the
page content.
Konqueror:
I use KDE's Konqueror to transfer files between my workstation and the
Web server. I set it up as follows:
* Hit F9 to get rid of the left sidebar
* Click "Split View Left/Right" on the Window menu
* Set the veiw mode (on the View menu) in both windows to "Tree view"
* Set the left side to my local file store
* Set the right side to my Web server file store. (To do this
simply type ftp://user my webserver com in the Location: box.)
* Save the setup using the "Configure View Profiles" on the
"Settings" menu. And give the setup a name.
* Restore the setup at any time by choosing its name from the
"Settings > Load View Profile" menu.
Quanta:
I really only use Quanta for quickly creating new content from sources
like text files, MS Word documents, etc. After than, I just use
Kate/Konqueror.
Drawbacks:
Heck no, this system isn't perfect! But it works...
Here are some things that I still need to do
* Find a WebDav, CVS, or other versioning system that will make it
easier for a group of people to work on the files without stepping on
each other's toes.
* I should probably find a more elegant way of doing the header and
footer includes.
* I'm most of the way toward a simple CMS, so I'll probably just go
ahead and build one, and thereby solving the above two problems.
In Conclusion:
I hope this has been helpful in some way. Feel free to send me
suggestions, questions, or comments.