is fedora so slow ?

[d l]

--- Jon Shorie <jshorie at medinaco.org> からのメッセージ：
> On Monday 12 April 2004 12:50,
> fedora-list-request at redhat.com wrote:
> > I have installed fedora core 1 on my computer, 
> after 2 days challenging
> > with display adaptor .the motherboard is asus
> p4vp-mx with  s3 prosavage
> > k133 , via VT6103 ethernet card and CPU is
> celeron. now every thing is
> > fine,other than  speed, specialy when the color
> depth of display is a
> > milioncolors.i redused the the resolution to 256
> color.it is better now but
> > steel slow. the other thing is fedora recognized
> NIC as a VT6102 which is
> > defferent but working . is it fedora core 1 is
> slow at all or maybe
> > ethernet driver or display adaptor is not
> recognized properly by fedora .
> > any suggestion would be great help.
> 
> How much and which type of ram is in your system.  I
> have found fedora 
> unbelieveable slow with 256 of PC133 or 192 of
> DDR266.  It is acceptable with 
> 384 of PC133 or 256 of DDR266 and runs quite nice
> with 512 of 133 or 384 of 
> DDR.
> 
> Now before some of you start flaming me for this, I
> do know that fedora is not 
> running out of memory on these configurations.  What
> is happening is that the 
> memory is made available for use as a cache which
> helps programs to run much 
> faster.
> 
> With memory prices running $20-40 for 256mb ram, I
> would definitely suggest a 
> memory upgrade.
> 
> 
> -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

I am using fed2 on p166/128MB/2.4G HDD, and your are
saying 256MB ram is unbelivably slow :-(

Gnome/kde are nice, but they are know to be not speed
champs.
You might want to use windowsmaker(or just f at ck gui all
together) on low end box.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
http://bb.yahoo.co.jp/