Hoping for OOo 1.1.1 for FC1? (was Re: OpenOffice.org Calc 4-11 date bug?)

[Dexter Ang]

On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 22:01, antonio montagnani wrote:
> Dexter Ang wrote/ha scritto, On/il 28/04/2004 15:57:
> 
> >On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 21:40, antonio montagnani wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>>On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 16:47, Dexter Ang wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>OK I just want to clarify what I've typed and expand on it a little.
> >>>
> >>>I use Calc for entering financial information. This would obviously use
> >>>dates. Now, I have an entire column of cells formatted as dates and
> >>>displays in the format MM/DD/YYYY. Now, whenever I enter the date 4/11,
> >>>or 4/11/4, it doesn't convert to the date format. But when enter any
> >>>other date, it does convert it to the MM/DD/YYYY date format I've
> >>>selected. I've also tried entering 4/11/3, 4/11/4, 4/11/5, and it only
> >>>happens with year 2004.
> >>>
> >>>I have also confirmed that this happens on a friends computer with
> >>>OpenOffice.org 1.1.0 on Windows. Anyway it seems to be an OpenOffice.org
> >>>bug if it happens on Windows as well. I haven't tested on 1.1.1, so if
> >>>anyone has any knowledge of a bug and it being fixed in 1.1.1, I'd like
> >>>to know.
> >>>
> >>>By the way, my version is OpenOffice.org 1.1.0 that came with Fedora
> >>>Core 1. I've also updated to the latest build 16. It happened with the
> >>>original and build 16 for me.
> >>>
> >>>Argh.
> >>>
> >>>dex
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>Openoffice 1.1.1 is o.k.: no experience with 1.1.0.Please check buglist 
> >>in www.Openoffice.org
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Ok I found it. It seems it's been fixed in OOo 1.1.1. I had to search
> >through their mailing list to find the bug report at:
> >
> >http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17222
> >
> >Any chance of getting OOo 1.1.1 rpms for FC1? Or will I have to move to
> >FC2 if I want that fix in?
> >
> >dex
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> If you have any automatic update of Fedora(RehHat tool, yum or apt) , it 
> should be picked up immediately and updated (about 100 MB of stuff, if I 
> remember.)

Yup, but that's still 1.1.0. not 1.1.1. If the maintainer backported the
fix, it doesn't show. I'm just hoping for an update to 1.1.1. =D

dex