FC1 ghostscript update requires gdk-pixbuf and gtk+?
Michael Schwendt
fedora at wir-sind-cool.org
Wed Aug 18 15:34:17 UTC 2004
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:16:47 +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:20:03 +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> > > (@Michael)
> > > There is a seperate package for gsx, called ghostscript-gtk, but
> > > the only file in this package is gsx itself. I see no problem that
> > > *this* package depends on gtk and gdk-pixbuf, but why ghostscript?
> >
> > Packaging bug?
>
> It seems so. I have just checked this on another machine (FC2) without
> ghostscript-gtk installed, and there I have /usr/bin/gsx, too.
>
> > $ rpm -qlvp ghostscript-7.07-29.i386.rpm | grep gsx
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 14468 Jun 25 18:44
> > /usr/bin/gsx $ rpm -qlvp ghostscript-gtk-7.07-29.i386.rpm | grep gsx
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 14468 Jun 25 18:44
> > /usr/bin/gsx
>
> But why does this give no file conflict during the installation of
> ghostscript-gtk?
Because both packages contain exactly the same file with the same
checksum. That is permitted.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list