Re: Fedora Extras is extra

[Dag Wieers <dag wieers com>]

On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Jeff Spaleta wrote:

> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 05:54:43 +0100 (CET), Dag Wieers <dag wieers com> wrote:
> > Implying that I'm not willing to work together (what you've done
> > repeatedly now) is not really nice though.
> 
> I have not meant imply that you are unwilling to contribute under any
> circumstances. I'm sure if Fedora Extra's initial policy was exactly
> what you wanted you would contribute. What I am concerned about is
> trying to find out exactly under which conditions you are and are not
> willing to contribute. What would be blocking issues and what are
> issues that you can compromise over  initially and work towards
> resolution inside the contributor process.

I thought I've been pretty clear about that. What's missing is information 
about Fedora Extras to put the pieces together.


> From where I stand I'm not sure Fedora Extras as its initial policy will 
> be laid out will be compatible with your personal desire to see a zero 
> overhead solution, and I'm not sure how much overhead you are willing to 
> put up with.  If there is a failing here, its my personally failing to 
> understand with accuracy the tenancy of your desire to be invovled.

Fair enough. It seems you have some inside information that I don't to 
draw such conclusions. I'll simply have to wait (proceed with what we're 
doing) and see.

--   dag wieers,  dag wieers com,  http://dag.wieers.com/   --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]