[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?

From: Steve Bergman <steve rueb com>
To: Fedora-List <fedora-list redhat com>
Subject: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 20:18:37 -0600

I'm interested to know what the reasons were for switching from TightVNC
to RealVNC.  I know that earlier versions of RedHat/Fedora Linux used
TightVNC, but now RealVNC seems to have replaced it.

Understand, I'm not in disagreement with the change, but as I am
evaluating both for a project, I'm curious.

-Steve Bergman

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
  - From: Timothy Ha
- Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
  - From: Tim Waugh

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]