[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?

From: Timothy Ha <linuxmail yandex ru>
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
Subject: Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:09:18 +0300

Is it because RealVNC is popular in Windows systems?

I could not connect from FC2 to a Windows box with RealVNC on it.

Timothy.

Steve Bergman wrote:

I'm interested to know what the reasons were for switching from TightVNC
to RealVNC.  I know that earlier versions of RedHat/Fedora Linux used
TightVNC, but now RealVNC seems to have replaced it.

Understand, I'm not in disagreement with the change, but as I am
evaluating both for a project, I'm curious.

-Steve Bergman

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
  - From: William Hooper

References:
- Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
  - From: Steve Bergman

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]