Linux Word Processors
Jeff Vian
jvian10 at charter.net
Thu Dec 23 02:56:50 UTC 2004
On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 08:56 -0700, Robin Laing wrote:
> Ryan D'Baisse wrote:
> > Okay, I am beginning to see just how many apps out there are
> > classified as word processors. So, allow me to get a bit more
> > specific...
> >
> > 1. The editor must be WYSIWYG;
> >
> > 2. It must be able to import to, and export from, Microsoft Word
> > format without any difficulties; and,
>
> I will state that this won't ever happen unless all users are using
> the same version with the same installation configuration. I hear the
> screams as people that are working on collaborations get work back
> that doesn't look like the copy previously worked on. More hours lost
> re-formatting.
>
I think the *unreasonable* goal here is that it must interface with the
proprietary format word documents, "without difficulty" and we all know
that M$ changes the format regularly to prevent that.
Thus an unreachable goal and a better plan would be to go to a
standardized format that is not dependent upon the whims of M$. One that
many editors can use easily and without the stress of trying to reverse
engineer a format that is deliberately closed.
> >
> > 3. It must have strong formatting abilities. For example, when I
> > mentioned "intelligent bulleting," I was referring to the ability to
> > hit <TAB> and have the editor indent a paragraph and renumber the
> > paragraph with the next appropriate hierarchy (i.e., I, A, 1, i, a,
> > etc.). OpenOffice and StarOffice attempt to do this, but they fail
> > after the second level.
>
> From what I have heard. Word is just awful for formatting the "Way
> you want it" and from my limited experience it is. As stated above,
> Word will convert and change whole documents formatting if you make
> one little change. Worse, it won't always undo cleanly. I have
> converted some scientists over to OpenOffice on Windows to overcome
> this problem.
>
I have had similar experiences.
> >
> > Simply put, I need something where I can compose a professional
> > document, with as much ease as possible, and then hand that file to a
> > printer for mass publication without any retooling of the document to
> > make it pretty. I want to be able to write, and have the editor
> > handle formatting correctly and cosmetically, so my concentration can
> > remain on the subject matter.
> >
> Most people that I know that write scientific papers do the writing
> first then the formatting. They may put some formatting in place as
> they write but it is finalized in the editing phase. This is when
> they find the limitations of Word. I don't know of a single person
> that makes it correct on the first go.
>
> Only two weeks ago I was searching for Windows Versions of LaTex
> editors for a scientist that had just lost all the formatting in Word.
>
> Then there is the added benefit of OpenOffice being able to open MS
> word files that Word refuses to open. OOo 2.0 preview has been
> released and it is supposed to be better at handling Microsoft Office
> documents.
> --
> Robin Laing
>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list