Security updates are too slow or none existant

William Hooper whooperhsd3 at earthlink.net
Sat Feb 7 23:51:27 UTC 2004


Nathan G. Grennan said:
>   The difference in speed of release of updates, or the release of the
> updates at all seems to have greatly changed with time between Red Hat
> Linux 9 and Fedora Core 1.

Have you read the FAQ?

http://fedora.redhat.com/about/faq/
What is the errata policy for The Fedora Project?

If you want guarantees buy RHEL.

Also, compairing one release to another doesn't make sense.  RHL 9 has had
kernel updates that FC 1 didn't need because it was already patched.

-- 
William Hooper





More information about the fedora-list mailing list