Security updates are too slow or none existant
William Hooper
whooperhsd3 at earthlink.net
Sat Feb 7 23:51:27 UTC 2004
Nathan G. Grennan said:
> The difference in speed of release of updates, or the release of the
> updates at all seems to have greatly changed with time between Red Hat
> Linux 9 and Fedora Core 1.
Have you read the FAQ?
http://fedora.redhat.com/about/faq/
What is the errata policy for The Fedora Project?
If you want guarantees buy RHEL.
Also, compairing one release to another doesn't make sense. RHL 9 has had
kernel updates that FC 1 didn't need because it was already patched.
--
William Hooper
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list