Security updates are too slow or none existant

[Chuck Mize]

On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 18:19, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 02:49, Chuck Mize wrote:
> > On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 16:59, Ernest L. Williams Jr. wrote:
> > 
> > > Yes, and I did not have to pay for Debian either!  
> > > I am just trying to make a valid point.  
> > > I like Fedora but that does not mean that the original e-mail thread was
> > > invalid.  
> > > Fedora does have room for improvement.
> > 
> > Can you name any security exploits that exist that haven't been
> > addressed?
> 
> You also seem to be denying that there is a difference in speed of
> releasing security updates for rh9 and fc1. Have you compared the
> updates lists and the src.rpms?
> 

I'll repeat the question again: Can you name any security exploits that
exist that haven't been addressed?