Security updates are too slow or none existant

[Pedro Fernandes Macedo]

Bart Martens wrote:

>No, "testing" is not the place for security updates. When the security
>updates are released for rh9, the security updates for fc1 should
>already have gone through "testing", and be released to the public.
>  
>

I know , but I still believe that security updates have to be tested 
just as all the other packages , as they may also break something , 
specially if you think about how they're made: in a rush , trying to 
solve the issue as fast as possible.... I know that programming in that 
conditions can lead to some problems...

--
Pedro Macedo