What's wrong with the up2date???
Roger Beever
roger2 at rogernet.net
Fri Feb 13 18:22:20 UTC 2004
On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 18:13, M.Hockings wrote:
> Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>
> >Am Fr, den 13.02.2004 schrieb António Vasconcelos um 18:19:
> >
> >
> >>Hello.
> >>I have Fedora installed (Core 1) and I just can't complete the update
> >>list.... Or because of service was reseted or, because the downloads
> >>are transfering at very low speed (and it's is not a problem with my
> >>connection...).
> >>Can anyone tell me what is happening?
> >>Too much people accessing the site, the updates or just....????
> >>
> >>Thank you very much to all for your patience and dedication
> >>Best regards
> >>António Vasconcelos - PT
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Use a mirror server! kernel updates and the new FC2 test1 slow down the
> >main server. Follow:
> >
> >http://fedoranews.org/contributors/alexander_dalloz/mirror
> >
> >Alexander
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Good article Alexander.
>
> I have a question. I have a local mirror that I create by rsync'ing
> with a mirror. This works very well to keep the 4 or 5 FC1 machines
> here updated. I notice that occasionally I seem to pick up a corrupt
> file from the mirror and I have to delete the rpm and re-rsync with
> another mirror to pick up a good version. My question is this, do
> mirrors self-correct in that they detect a difference in the file and
> pull down the correct version on their next sync or is it a user's
> responsibility to report it to the mirror's operator?
>
> In my case the kernel source for the 2166 kernal was only 5M (should be
> around 40M) from zeniiia in the UK.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Mike
> Mike if it was the latest kernel and before about 23:00 last night
the answer is they get corrected.
Either that or I'm running a very odd part kernel ;-)
Regards Roger
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list