Is SMP stability any better?

Vincent pros-n-cons at bak.rr.com
Fri Feb 27 04:36:00 UTC 2004


On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:14:08 +0000
WipeOut <wipe_out at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> Res wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, WipeOut wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Just wondering if anyone has found the latest SMP kernel and more stable..
> >>
> >>I found it fine for the first day and a half but after that it started
> >>hanging the system more than once per day.. It seems that this issue
> >>will be around till FC2 comes out since it has not been fixed in all the
> >>kernel releases since FC1 came out..
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >forget it... avoid like the plague
> >
> >  
> >
> It can be avoided for HT systems but what about all those who have full 
> SMP systems, if they avoid the SMP kernel they only get to use a single 
> proc.. not such a nice thought.. :)
> 
> 

My work around was to disable autofs at boot up, Haven't had a hang for a month 
or so. But I do not mount anything other than windows D drive, I think the samba/NFS
people are the ones having trouble.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040226/8cc710bf/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list