Bind v. TinyDNS

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 20:04, Mark Mielke wrote:
> In the end, I as a user don't care. If I can see the source code, and apply
> my own patches, I have what I need. So if it is "I have a server: Should I
> use BIND or TinyDNS?" my answer would *not* be primarily based on
> "Which one comes with Fedora?" (although other people may choose this
> criteria...).

I, as a user, DO CARE. I do not want to feel I'm doing something wrong,
if I'm trying to help my other friend, who knows even less than I do,
but I am torn between respecting the author of a program or my
friendship.

I, as a system administrator, DO CARE. I do not want to mingle with
software that has unfair restrictions, which might hurt my company or a
sub-company I may have the need to redistribute the software.

There's a couple of reasons TO CARE.

You, however, keep looking into your belly button satisfied with what
you get and advising people to NOT CARE.

Who's wrong?

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040104/5c52e849/attachment-0001.sig>