Update patches versus full update RPM.

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 15:48, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday 09 January 2004 10:24 am, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 15:20, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > > For those who don't follow fedora-devel, I would like to summarize what I
> > > have found after making a proposal and requesting comments about a
> > > mechanism to reduce the amount of bandwidth that is wasted downloading
> > > updates.
> 
> > You could summarize before having incited people to pester the
> > fedora-devel-list, right?
> 
> That was the summary.  There has been backlash; demand needs to be 
> established.  You want it, ask the developers.  What's wrong with that 
> picture?

A different definition of summary.

You just said there's something you find useful (not explaining anything
-- but I know what you want), but the people on fedora-devel-list don't
seem inclined to do it, so go pester them.

That's mongering, not summary, to me.

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040109/9376e61c/attachment-0001.sig>