Update patches versus full update RPM.
Lamar Owen
lowen at pari.edu
Sat Jan 10 16:01:51 UTC 2004
On Friday 09 January 2004 07:36 pm, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > To repeat the gist of the last message I wrote on this subject ot
> > fedora-devel, I am going to implement a diffing system for the PostgreSQL
> > RPMs that I distribute from ftp.postgresql.org. I will see how it works,
> > once I get around to doing it. Then if the Fedora Core project wants to
> > adapt it, that is up to them.
> That sounds better. How did you solve the signing issue? Straight binary
> diffs won't work very well you see.
I haven't solved the signing issue yet. Thus my request for comments in
-devel. The archives of that list are public; see a thread "Request for
Comments: updating RPMs using binary deltas."
As mentioned on that list, SuSE are distributing binary patches NOW. They do
have space savings NOW. Their method could stand some improvement; we can
improve upon it.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list