[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Whitebox Linux
- From: Tarjei Knapstad <tarjeik chemcon no>
- To: Fedora <fedora-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Whitebox Linux
- Date: 13 Jan 2004 16:00:19 +0100
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 14:08, David C. Hart wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 07:30, Mark wrote:
> > Yes and currently testing it. Seems like a good distro so far.
> >
> > On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 06:16, WipeOut wrote:
> > > Has anyone taken a look at www.whiteboxlinux.org ??
> > >
> > > Its basically RHEL 3 recompiled from the src.rpms. No price, No restrictions..
> > >
> Fedora looks more current. Is there anything in WB that is not in FC1?
That's not the point. WhiteBox is a rebuild of the RHEL3 distro and has
nothing to do with Fedora (except the fact that RHEL3 is based off FC1).
WhiteBox is a free alternative for your servers, not an alternative to
Fedora.
--
Tarjei
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]